The context and its role in directing Syntax

Abstract

The research deals with the subject of presumption in terms of the concept and the importance inherent in understanding the meaning and defining the meaning of the speech if the structure is possible in more than one way, with the role it plays in defining the grammatical functions of the vocabulary.

We have referred to the two main types of context (verbal and intangible), and for each of them we have chosen some of the most frequently used branches. The context is the case), although the overlap between them is taken for granted. We have given examples for each of this from the Holy Qur’an and some of the words of the Arabs as evidence that proves the role of the presumption in guiding syntax, each according to it.

In the end, we mentioned a number of benefits summarized in the following

1- A number of clues may converge to indicate one intention to confirm it.

2- Some words may have the same inflection in two different combinations, but due to the presumption of limitation and varying degrees, other connotations are added.

3- A single word may have a verbal inflection different from the inflection of the meaning in one composition, and it may have the same verbal inflection in two different syntaxes, but there are indications that its semantic inflection differs in them.

4- The presumption may not be present in a combination that may be multifaceted, so that would be evidence of the will of the whole.

  Finally, we emphasized the need to give the topic of the presumption its right in order to reveal the most accurate meanings, and the grammatical meanings specifically for what is known of the semantic, morphological, contextual, mental and current grammatical interdependence.... None of them is indispensable to the other in any linguistic and grammatical study whatsoever.